Column
"And Iran, Iran So Far Away, I
Couldn't Get Away," Sung by Barack Obama
By Doug Giles
Obama said in his latest hem-hawing, foreign policy
bloviating, what-the-hell-is-he-talkin'-about press conference that
"we need to have a vigorous debate" regarding
Iran's current tyrannical Muslim-based governmental crushing of young people who desire a touch of freedom.
We need to debate? "We" who,
BHO?
I'm guessin' he is talking about American liberals and conservatives
because-from what I can deduce from the YouTube
vids-it appears as if the Iranian dissidents
aren't looking for lively banter with the death dealing, lying through coffee-stained teeth religious whack jobs who look like a group of angry, homeless Santa Clauses on crack.
A debate, Mr. O? Really?
FYI to the Whitehouse: Ayatollahs, mullahs, and Ahmadinejads
don't discuss stuff. They shoot you in the face. You
don't believe me? Well, then just ask Neda, a beautiful freedom-loving 26-year-old Iranian protester who lives in Tehran.
What's that? The Tehran terror cops, the Basij, shot her? See, I told you so. Uncut Islam
doesn't debate; it deals death to dissenters and, it seems, Mohammed is cool with that. Jesus
isn't okay with it, but Mohammed is.
Yes, El Presidente, you kind of need two intelligent parties that are able to chill in order to actually have a profitable discussion.
From what I've seen, historically speaking, a vigorous and beneficial chat is the perk that a Judeo-Christian based nation, which has an armed citizenry, gets to enjoy. Oppressive, mucked-up Muslim nations like Iran
don't argue about their bogus elections or dictates with intelligent, liberty-loving, non step-n-fetch rebels. As stated, they pistol whip them, split their skulls with a night stick, drag non-compliant co-eds around by their scalps, or simply pull out their guns and double tap the center mass of the unarmed non-compliants. God only knows what
we're going find out about the June 24th, 2009 massacre in Baharestan square. I heard they used axes and threw protestors off pedestrian bridges.
Ah . . . Islam in action. How peaceful. What an awesome religion.
Y'know, after watching the past two weeks of Ayatollahs Gone Wild, slamming their zealous fists on their podiums, spewing more propaganda than Robert Gibbs does during his weekly presser, and pummeling any and all dissenting voices,
I'm sure many people around the world are lining up to become Muslims and move to a country governed by mullahs. It looks fun,
doesn't it? I mean, it's a little bloody and oppressive and all, but hey . . . nobody is perfect.
From a PR standpoint, Iran is for Islam what Perez Hilton is for homosexuality.
And Barack wants to have a debate? A debate?
Puh-lease.
It must be nice to live in la-la-land where trees are made of chocolate, where cigarettes fall from heaven, where you can print trillions of dollars and idiots approve it, where your administration can Pac Man the private sector, tax the crap out of our people, rob their health care, hard sell us bogus energy bills, while gutting the
constitution-a place where you get to be the leader of the most powerful place on the planet simply because you can read a mean teleprompter.
I don't believe the Iranians
who'd like a free election (shame on them) want us to mediate a spicy round table spat. I think they desire a little more. I think they want us to meddle on a Guns & Ammo type level. Thus the protest signs in English. Kinda seems odd
they'd go English with their placards if they
didn't want our attention and involvement.
I, for one, believe that we should meddle in such slave states. The
"we" I believe that should intervene is the old America spelled with a
"c" and not the new Amerika spelled with a "k".
The reason I think it's a good thing Obama and his admin stays the hell out of this Iranian throw down is two fold: If the young Iranians can topple their crap government,
it'll be a real morale boost, eh? I know it was for
America's founding fathers, God bless 'em.
Secondly, if I were a Neda in Iran, I
wouldn't trust Obama as far as I could spit a loogie. Why? Well, it seems as if he has a soft spot for Muslim terrorists. Yep, this President is the same guy who, just before
Iran's election, sent the Ayatollah a good luck letter, is releasing 250 of the worst SOBs on the planet (the terrorists from Gitmo) to foreign countries (I hear the recidivist rate among terrorists is rather high), whose DOJ appointees want to prosecute CIA operatives who crack down on terrorists (hello), and
who's giving, I believe, over a billion dollars in aid via the UN to
frickin' Hamas. Yes, if I were a dissident I would tell BHO and his boys thanks, but no thanks.
Finally, mad to props to GWB for spawning hope for free elections in the heart of young Iranians as they watched their next-door neighbors enjoy real democracy in Iraq.
Oh . . . and one more thing. I don't hear too many
"moderate Muslims" condemning Iran's murderous mullahs. Hmmm.
That's interesting. You'd figure they'd be on those mooks like stink on a monkey. But maybe
they're just too busy. Who knows?
|
Column Archives for
2007 2006 2005 2004 2001
Sign up
for a weekly dose of wit, wisdom, satire and
righteous outrage. Doug sets his sights high and
wide as he unleashes his unique pen on the
absurdities within the Church and the inequities
in the world. This weekly adrenaline jolt is a
must for those who want to see righteousness
exalt our nation. Expect hard hitting,
provocative and humorous commentary as Giles
dissects our current culture.
|
|
